In December, Emanuel announced that the fine for resisting a police officer would be doubled from its current range of $25 to $500 to $200 to $1,000. The mayor's ordinance also restricted the hours of public parks, playgrounds and beaches in accordance with the Chicago Park District's hours of operation. A second ordinance applying to the protests also, among other changes, requires organizers to provide a parade marshal of their own for every 100 demonstration participants.The oringinal proposal also limited the time periods for protest and the use of bullhorns. Today, in the face of protests from protesters and aldermen (among others), Emanuel backed off the increased fines provision. He had previously relented regarding some of the other resrtictions.
However, the proposal still calls for an increased number of surveillance cameras; closing of parks and beaches until 6 a.m.; parade restrictions and higher fees for parades and protests. The police supt. is also empowered to “deputize” out-of-state law enforcement personnel experienced in handling civil unrest. If the past is a reliable guide (and I'm betting it is), these and other measures will lead to substantial limits on public protest, many lawsuits, and settlement liability imposed on the City of Chicago.
This is not the 1968 DNC. It's too bad we have progressed so little in terms of how we often characterize, and how officials treat, lawful protest activity. Before the first parade has hit the streets, the Mayor is seeking emergency powers and police are preparing to do battle with boots on the ground. It's true that mass protests come with some threat to public safety. So do state fairs, holiday parades, and large conventions. But the act of public protest is not itself a threat. Chicago officials would do well to keep that in mind as they prepare for May.